Chapter 7: Introduction to Budgeting
How organisations plan, allocate responsibility and revise budgets as conditions change
About this Chapter
The planning and behavioural foundations of budgeting are established in this chapter. It covers why organisations budget, how the budgeting cycle operates, where information comes from and how responsibility is divided across managers and centres. It compares budgeting methods, participation approaches and the effect of target difficulty on behaviour, then addresses uncertainty, planning assumptions and revision. Coverage supports LO 1.1, LO 1.2, LO 1.3, LO 1.6 and LO 1.7, preparing the ground for the numerical budgeting chapters that follow.
Study Guide Highlights
Purposes and budgeting cycle
Budgets support planning, control, coordination, communication, motivation, evaluation and authorisation, but those purposes do not always pull in the same direction. Budgeting sits inside a continuing management cycle in which objectives are set, plans are implemented, actual results are compared with expectations and significant differences prompt action. It is therefore an ongoing organisational process rather than a once-a-year spreadsheet exercise.
Responsibility and controllability
Responsibility accounting links performance information to the managers who can influence it. The chapter distinguishes cost, revenue, profit and investment centres and examines what managers should reasonably be held accountable for. Direct and indirect costs are considered, along with the role of budget committees, budget accountants and senior management. The central qualification is controllability: performance measures should reflect the authority actually available.
Participation and budgeting methods
Top-down and bottom-up participation create different benefits and risks, including acceptance, information sharing, budgetary slack and perceptions of fairness. Rolling, incremental, zero-based, activity-based, priority-based and contingency approaches are also compared. No single method is presented as universally best; the appropriate choice depends on the organisation's circumstances, the purpose of the budget and the stability or uncertainty of its environment.
Uncertainty and budget revision
Budgets rest on planning assumptions that can change. Models, reforecasting, revised budgets and rolling approaches are considered as ways of responding to uncertainty. Revision is not treated as an automatic response to any adverse result: management needs to understand what assumption changed, whether the change is material and whether it lies outside the manager's control before deciding that the original budget should be rebuilt.
Responsibility-accounting questions should be answered by reference to what the manager can influence in the stated circumstances. Avoid assuming that every adverse result is automatically evidence of poor management.
Read the requirement carefully. Commands such as explain and discuss call for developed reasoning, while state or identify normally require a more concise response focused directly on the requested point.
Chapter Resources
Slides for this chapter.
PPT coming soon
PowerPoint SlidesCourse Navigation
- 01 Activity Based Costing
- 02 Target Costing and Life Cycle Costing
- 03 Limiting Factor Analysis
- 04 Linear Programming
- 05 Short-Term Decision Making
- 06 Calculating Forecasts
- 07 Introduction to Budgeting Current
- 08 Budgeting Processes
- 09 Further Aspects of Budgeting
- 10 Standard Costing and Variances
- 11 Performance Measurement and Control
- 12 Divisional Performance
- 13 Long-Term Decision Making
- 14 Impact of Technology