Chapter 4: Linear Programming
Optimising production when several constraints affect the available choices
About this Chapter
Linear programming is introduced here for production decisions where several constraints operate at the same time. The chapter covers the assumptions behind the model, the role of decision variables, objective functions and constraints, and the meaning of the feasible region. It then considers graphical solutions, the interpretation of corner points, and the use of simultaneous equations to obtain exact intersections. Coverage supports LO 3.4 and provides the multiple-constraint counterpart to the single limiting-factor problems covered earlier.
Study Guide Highlights
Purpose and model assumptions
Linear programming provides a structured way to choose between feasible production combinations when more than one resource or requirement constrains the decision. The chapter sets out the assumptions that make the model workable, including stable relationships between activity and resource use. A mathematical optimum depends on those assumptions and therefore represents a model of the decision rather than a complete description of business reality.
Variables, objectives and constraints
The model uses variables to represent the quantities being chosen, an objective function to express what the organisation wants to maximise or minimise, and constraints to represent limits or minimum requirements. Clear definitions and consistent units matter throughout. Non-negativity is also part of the model because production quantities cannot be meaningfully represented by negative values.
Feasible regions and vertices
Each constraint removes combinations that cannot be achieved, leaving a feasible region containing the combinations that satisfy all restrictions. The important candidate solutions lie at the region's vertices, and a graph can show which constraints meet at the optimum. A graph does not have to be decorative; its value is in making the feasible set and relevant intersections visible.
Exact intersections and practical output
Where the optimal point occurs at the intersection of binding constraints, simultaneous equations can be used to identify its exact coordinates. The chapter also considers what happens when a mathematical solution produces fractional units that are not practical. The underlying objective remains to compare feasible alternatives consistently, while recognising that whole-unit production may require a practical adjustment rather than blind acceptance of a fractional result.
Write the decision variables clearly before starting the calculation. This reduces the risk of switching products or units part-way through and makes the logic of the later objective and constraints easier to follow.
A graph does not need perfect presentation, but it must be accurate enough to identify the feasible region and the constraints meeting at the relevant corner. Accuracy matters because the graph drives the interpretation.
Chapter Resources
Slides for this chapter.
PPT coming soon
PowerPoint SlidesCourse Navigation
- 01 Activity Based Costing
- 02 Target Costing and Life Cycle Costing
- 03 Limiting Factor Analysis
- 04 Linear Programming Current
- 05 Short-Term Decision Making
- 06 Calculating Forecasts
- 07 Introduction to Budgeting
- 08 Budgeting Processes
- 09 Further Aspects of Budgeting
- 10 Standard Costing and Variances
- 11 Performance Measurement and Control
- 12 Divisional Performance
- 13 Long-Term Decision Making
- 14 Impact of Technology